Here's one where Bill declared 2♠. It was tricky, and we did manage to beat it. I'm not sure if he could have played it better, or if we just did well in defence. Double Dummy, it's one off.
|
|
I led the ♥K, and another ♥ to Norman's Q. Norma switched to a ♣. Declarer has 7 tricks, and can make an eighth if he can contrive to ruff the fourth heart, so I think we might already have missed our chance to defeat this contract legitimately - I probably need to lead a trump at trick two. However, Bill now drew two rounds of trumps and gave up the lead in hearts, and it was easy enough for us to cash our 6 tricks for one off. It's actually not easy for declarer - I think you have to just play a heart back at trick three, but you can't afford to over-ruff anything in dummy, so you're pretty much playing for spades to be exactly as they are. On the other hand, I don't think there are many other options.
♠♥♦♣
Here's one that I think I may have misbid, but my hand is a bit of a freak, and I can't figure out how to get the information I need from my partner.....
|
|
|
On the first hand North is missing a card, I think he should have A4 of Spades.
ReplyDeleteSounds like declarer was playing for Hearts 3-3 (in which case there is also no reason not to play Hearts early).
On the second one, what happened at the other tables, did you get a good result for making 4 Hearts?
Fixed first hand. Agree 3-3 ♥ is another possibility for declarer, but as you say, he pretty much can't go wrong if the hearts are 3-3. Also not sure how likely 3-3 hearts is given the first two rounds - would Norman have played the 2 from QJ2? Maybe, I suppose, as there's not likely to be much need to unblock, and it let's me know he's got the Q, but then why win the second trick with the Q and not the J?
ReplyDeleteSecond hand was a joint bottom with about half the field. You can't help making 12 tricks in either major (♠K is onside), so those who did bid the slam did well.